Mittwoch, 23. September 2009

Stanford scam bilked Jews out of millions


By Todd Bensman
SAN ANTONIO, Texas - Over the past 15 years, Kadima, a Jewish charity in Mexico City, has helped developmentally disabled Jews live to their fullest potential. The charity, which has 250 beneficiaries, offers day care for adults with Downs Syndrome, and provides job training and placement for the mentally handicapped.

To ensure that the aid would be there despite the frequent turmoil in Mexico's economy, for years the charity has vigorously raised funds, and has scrimped and saved wherever possible. "What we really wanted to do with the money is to make sure the institution can go for another 10 years," said Sofie Freiman, head of Kadima's fundraising efforts. "It was a great deal of money for an institution that relies on donations by other people.
It took us 13 years to save it."

By 2009, Kadima had amassed enough money that its directors planned to expand the clinic and start up new programs.

Now, most of that money is gone. The charity had invested its nest egg with R. Allen Stanford's Houston-based Stanford Financial Group, which, according to U.S. prosecutors and the Securities and Exchange Commission, was an $8 billion Ponzi scheme. The alleged Stanford fraud is the world's second biggest Ponzi scheme, after the $65 billion Bernard L. Madoff case.

It has been widely reported that Madoff wiped out the fortunes of many wealthy Jewish families and charities. Now a GlobalPost Passport investigation reveals that, as a victim of Stanford, Kadima was far from alone among the Jewish communities of Latin America.

According to numerous interviews with victims, community leaders and lawyers representing them, Stanford laid financial waste to Jewish organizations and individuals of every income level. A lawyer representing Latin American victims estimates that half of the one billion dollars lost in Mexico came from the capital's 40,000-strong Jewish population. The smaller Jewish community of Caracas, Venezuela also appears to have been hit hard.

In both cities, Stanford - who was called Sir Allen after being knighted by the Antiguan prime minister in 2006 - mounted aggressive advertising campaigns and hired Jewish salesmen, who used their connections and trust within the community to bring in money.

The same way that many American Jews entrusted Madoff with their fortunes, many Latino Jews were so confident in the consistently high returns from Stanford's investments that they invested substantial portions of their savings with him.

And while he had many victims from other faiths, as a single ethnic group, the Jewish population was disproportionately hurt by the scandal. Many Christians were among his victims as well. Stanford is a graduate of Baylor University, a Baptist institute in Waco, Texas. He reportedly prayed with his sales force and used Christian connections to raise money. Nonetheless, the Jewish community is asking, did he deliberately target Jews? Or were they merely easy prey?

"This is where it's most painful, because they knew exactly who they were hurting," said Sofie Freiman, head of Kadima's fundraising efforts. Stanford's salesmen "targeted the Jewish community because they knew all these people. This is why we were hit. We are deeply hurt by this fraud and not just because we lost money."

It is well known that the $65 billion Madoff Ponzi operation exploited a phenomenon known to criminologists as "ethnic affinity crime" to gain the trust necessary to lure investments from thousands of American Jewish institutions and families. Madoff's exploitation of fellow American Jews has resonated as a caveat to future unsuspecting investors, not to be taken in by their own kind.

But dozens of interviews with Stanford victims and their lawyers show the scheme in Mexico alone left a trail cluttered with damage: Jewish schools struggling to pay teachers; widows and retirees without the means to support themselves; young married couples without wedding endowments; and once-wealthy families bereft of prosperity built over lifetimes. Childrens' college funds are gone. After-hours day care facilities are struggling, along with libraries and synagogues as donations from hard-hit donors dry up.

"Everybody knows somebody who got hurt," said Monika Unikel, a Jewish Mexican who conducts walking tours of a historic Jewish neighborhood. "In Mexico, so many Jews lost everything. A lot of widows and institutions lost their money from that. Each one has an individual story to tell, but no one has written it."

In Venezuela, the Jewish community of 14,000 reports many similar misfortunes from investing in Stanford, also the result of the company's strategy to hire trusted Jewish sales people from the community.

Chief Rabbi Penchas Brener, who represents Caracas' largest synagogue, acknowledged that he lost $50,000 to Stanford from the endowment of an important local foundation he heads. That's a substantial sum in a country where per capita income is less than a third of that in the U.S.

"I don't know how hard it hit the community, but I know it hit," Brener told GlobalPost.

Easy Prey

The Texas born Stanford's rise was nearly as abrupt as his fall. He had owned several gyms in Waco, Texas that went bankrupt in the 1980s. Afterwards, he emerged as a financier who grew an investment banking empire, based in Antigua and Houston. By the time he landed on the Forbes 500 list, he was known as a colorful multi millionaire aficionado of mansions, cricket, fancy cars and women - including exes to whom he paid lavish alimony.

In February 2009, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission filed a civil suit alleging that Stanford's operations were fraudulent. Subsequently, Stanford and all of its subsidiaries collapsed, leaving investors with between $6 billion and $8 billion in worthless paper. He is now in federal custody facing 21 counts of conspiracy, fraud, bribery and obstruction of justice. He insists he is innocent.

To clients, Stanford had peddled seemingly-safe certificates of deposit that paid as much as twice the market rate. According to the SEC, the assets were in highly-illiquid real estate and private equity investments. The firm's victims were more far-flung internationally than Madoff's, the bulk of them in Mexico, South America and the Caribbean.

As class action lawsuits and criminal indictments move forward, the Stanford strategy of targeting Latin American Jews is only now beginning to emerge, according to several of the American law firms signing on clients.

San Antonio lawyer Ed Snyder is one of several Texas and New York attorneys representing well over 1,500 Mexican and Venezuelan victims in various lawsuits against Stanford, a number that is growing fast.

Snyder recounted how he first became aware of this one victim demographic: On his first trip to sign up Mexican clients in February, he was surprised to encounter furious Hasidic Jews wearing yarmulkes and other religious attire, speaking Yiddish before switching to Spanish. Subsequent trips to sign up clients and to hear their stories more than confirmed Snyder's initial impression.

He estimates that out of an estimated one billion dollars lost by some 4,000 Mexicans, about half came from Mexico City's Jews.

"My perception is that the Jewish community in Mexico City, for various reasons, has been heavily impacted by the Stanford disaster," Snyder said. "I think what you have here is a situation where that community was specifically targeted."

The story of Stanford's depredations in Mexico's Jewish community, however, has been slow to emerge because it is not one that anyone there is eager to tell. Although a number of people agreed to speak privately to GlobalPost, dozens impacted by the scam declined requests for on-the-record interviews, for fear of repercussions from both criminals and law enforcement officials. Some believed they were expatriating more money than Mexico legally allows, via Stanford. Others feared drawing the attention of Mexico's rampant kidnappers, which have so far largely left the community alone.

"What I can tell you," said Rabbi Marcelo Rittner, who leads one of Mexico City's larger synagogues "is that some people were really hit hard by this situation. I don't have much to tell you more than that because of confidentiality."

Jews weren't the only target. A practicing Protestant, he opened meetings with a prayer, the Brisbane Times reported. He also used his faith to recruit sales representatives, and to lure many of his estimated 30,000 victims worldwide.

There is no evidence that Stanford set out deliberately to target particular religious group, and no motive has emerged. But there was money to be had in the Jewish community, and he soon discovered them to be easy prey.

Stanford hired a Mexican Jew named David Nanes to open up a sales operation in Mexico ten years ago. Nanes actively recruited other Jews well known in the community, to devastating effect.

Kadima's chief fundraising officer, Sofie Frieman, described why Stanford was so successful duping Jews: "The Jewish community is very tight, so if someone comes up with a great idea recommended by another person you know, you listen," she said.

"It's word of mouth. If your brother and brother-in-law, and the friend of your wife, is making money you might go ahead and participate. You would never think in your life, if you're a widow, that a nice Jewish boy is going to fool you in a scam, because you know his mother and you never think he's going to take advantage," she said. "This is where it's most painful."

A favorite son, or a traitor?

Jewish victims in Mexico almost universally blame their ills on Nanes, who was born and raised in the Jewish community, married a local woman there and had children there.

According to his Houston lawyer, Stanford hired the 41-year-old MBA about ten years ago to take charge of opening up Mexico - and more recently, South America - to sales of financial products. When Stanford collapsed earlier this year, Nanes left Mexico with his family, facing death threats that his lawyer says continue to this day.

Neither U.S. nor Mexican authorities have accused Nanes of any wrongdoing, although serious alleged misdeeds are detailed at length in the San Antonio class action lawsuit, and in a new book published in Mexico called "The Paper Empire" by Mexican journalist Gabriel Bauducco.

Nanes' Houston attorney, Charles Parker, said his client always believed in the financial products he was selling.

"He never suspected anything was wrong," Parker said, adding that Nanes and his wife "lost several million, his parents even more." Believing that Stanford products were legitimate, Nanes naturally decided to market them to the Jewish community because "that's who he knew. That was the wealthiest community," Parker said.

It made sense for Nanes to recruit other Jews from the communities as sales officers because they also had extensive local connections there, Parker said.

"And word spread, and people were happy," Parker continued. "They got their return and passed it on to others. Everybody was pretty happy until everything went to hell in a hand basket."

The same strategy of targeting wealthy Jews and hiring Jewish sales officers also apparently unfurled in Venezuela, instilling a comfort level in potential clients like Rabbi Brener.

Brener said he felt almost no wariness about reaching out to one of Stanford's "account executives," a local Jewish man whose family he'd known for decades, to invest his foundation's $50,000 reserve account. "I didn't pay too much attention to the credentials," Brener said. "They were Venezuelan Jews. They worked for a bank. He didn't have to convince me; I called him. This was made easier, so to speak, by the fact that he was Jewish."

Reached by phone, the former Stanford salesman, Morris Serrero, told GlobalPost Passport he sold extensively to fellow Jews in Caracas and also to Jews in Panama and as far away as Switzerland. But he insisted he had no clue it was all a scam and said that he too lost most of his personal money and his parents' money when the Ponzi scheme was exposed. Serrero refused to talk further.

The good corporate neighbor

In Mexico, Kadima's Frieman refuses to believe that Nanes and at least some of his sales recruits didn't know their investments were being diverted and couldn't be redeemed.

Not long after Nanes brought Stanford to Mexico City's Jews, he instituted an aggressive marketing campaign that targeted the community. The company became a major, consistent corporate sponsor of cultural and sporting events, doling out generous amounts of money to local charities and organizations.

Stanford also advertised heavily in community publications, including a well-read sports center newsletter about teams the bank sponsored, said Renee Shabot, director of Tribuna, an organization that acts as a liaison between the Jewish community and the non-Jewish world.

"People got used to seeing the name, seeing their faces and so they trusted them," Shabot said.

Stanford was especially generous to Kadima. In fact, the company sponsored Kadima's annual fundraiser for so many years that board members felt they couldn't say no when Nanes put the squeeze on for the charity's endowment, Frieman said.

"If you're sponsoring me and helping me out, I understand it would be good to move my money to your bank," she said. "And also, some of the people on our board had their money there already. This is why we were so confident. But it was a scam. We were fooled like everybody else."

Today, Frieman counts herself among the minions of Mexican Jews who feel a strong enmity toward Nanes. She doesn't buy his story about not knowing the whole operation was a confidence swindle.

"I know a lot of people looking for him," she said. "People would probably spit in his face if they saw him. He harmed many, many honest hardworking people."


Read more: http://sivg.org/article/2009_Stanford_scam_bilked_Jews_out_of_millions.html

Visit the Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG official forum http://sivg.org/forum/

Sonntag, 13. September 2009

Former agent goes to court on Stanford-related charge

September 13, 2009
A former top federal drug agent appeared handcuffed in a Fort Lauderdale, Fla., federal court today, a day after he was indicted on charges related to the Stanford Financial Group fraud case.

Thomas Raffanello, who was Stanford Financial's global security director, is accused of conspiracy, destroying records and impeding a probe by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission into the operations of Stanford Financial, founded by Texas native R. Allen Stanford-who also faces criminal charges.

Raffanello is the former head of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration's Miami office.

Magistrate Robin Rosenbaum set bail at $100,000 and set Raffanello's arraignment for next Friday.

Raffanello, 61, is the second Stanford executive to be charged in Florida by prosecutors and federal securities regulators who accuse Stanford and others of bilking investors out of more than $7 billion through a scheme involving bogus certificates of deposit.

Thursday's three-count indictment accuses Raffanello, 61, and Bruce Perraud, 42, of helping to shred documents at Stanford Financial's office in Fort Lauderdale. Their lawyers have said the men only destroyed documents after giving investigators electronic duplicates.

R. Allen Stanford, who also denies wrongdoing, is being held without bail in a Conroe jail awaiting trial on a 19-count indictment by a federal grand jury in Houston. That indictment also named three other company executives and a banking regulator in the Caribbean island nation of Antigua and Barbuda.

Another company executive was charged separately, pleaded guilty and is cooperating with prosecutors.


Visit the Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG official forum http://sivg.org/forum/

Freitag, 4. September 2009

Toronto-Dominion Sued Over Stanford Investments

September 4, 2009
By Joe Schneider
Toronto-Dominion Bank, Canada's second-biggest bank, was accused in a lawsuit of negligence and knowing assistance for allegedly helping R. Allen Stanford, who is accused of swindling investors of more than $7 billion, the National Post reported.

The lawsuit, filed in Ontario Superior Court Aug. 26 by Bennett Jones LLP, seeks C$17 million ($15.5 million) for five Canadian investors who say Toronto-Dominion's role as a correspondent bank increased the credibility of Stanford's investments, the Post said. The investors claim they lost money in certificates of deposits based on recommendations made by a financial adviser who worked for the Stanford Group of companies, the Post said.

Toronto-Dominion conducted its business in an "appropriate and lawful manner," Susan Webb, a spokeswoman at the bank, told the newspaper.

Stanford, who faces 21 criminal charges, denies all wrongdoing tied to what the government says was a scheme to pay early investors "improbable if not impossible" returns with funds taken from later investors in Antiguan certificates of deposit. He is being held without bail until he can go on trial.


Visit the Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG official forum http://sivg.org/forum/

Samstag, 29. August 2009

Stanford Investors Accuse Lawyer, Law Firm of Aiding Fraud

August 29, 2009
By Andrew Harris
Three people who say they invested with R. Allen Stanford, the Texas financier accused of running a $7 billion fraud, sued New York law firm Proskauer Rose LLP and attorney Thomas Sjoblom, accusing them of aiding the deception.

The investors claim that the firm and Sjoblom, listed on the Proskauer Web site as a partner, worked for Stanford knowing he was engaged in illegal and improper conduct, according to a complaint in federal court in Dallas.

"Defendants aided and abetted and participated" with Stanford Financial Group Co. and Antigua-based Stanford International Bank Ltd. "in a fraudulent scheme, making defendants directly liable for fraud," according to the complaint filed Aug. 27.

Stanford, the principal of Stanford Financial Group and the bank, was sued in February by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission for allegedly running a "massive" fraud scheme involving the sale of certificates of deposit.

A federal grand jury in Houston indicted Stanford and four other people in June on parallel criminal allegations. Stanford has denied all allegations of wrongdoing.

Proskauer Rose said yesterday it will seek dismissal of the suit.

Legally Flawed

"This suit is legally flawed and factually erroneous," Josh Epstein, a firm spokesman, said in an e-mail. "There is no basis whatsoever for any claim that Proskauer, which functioned as defense counsel in a regulatory investigation, bears any responsibility for the fraud allegedly inflicted upon investors."

Sjoblom didn't reply to voice-mail and e-mail messages seeking comment yesterday.

The investors, two U.S. citizens and one Mexican national, seek class-action, or group, status on behalf of other Stanford investors. They're also seeking more than $7 billion in compensation and punitive damages.

The case is Troice v. Proskauer Rose LLP, 09cv1600, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas (Dallas).


Visit the Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG official forum http://sivg.org/forum/

Freitag, 28. August 2009

Ex-Stanford CFO Davis Pleads Guilty in Fraud Case

August 28, 2009
James M. Davis, chief financial officer of Stanford Financial Group Co., pleaded guilty to helping R. Allen Stanford in a $7 billion Ponzi scheme and prosecutors said he will testify against his former colleagues.

Davis, 60, admitted three felony counts today before U.S. District Judge David Hittner in Houston and agreed to forfeit $1 billion. Davis has been "cooperating like crazy" with authorities investigating the company, said his defense attorney, David Finn of Dallas.

"Mr. Davis knows he's looking at very, very stiff punishment down the road," Finn said after the plea hearing. "Probation is out of the question in this case."

The Justice Department will request leniency in Davis's sentencing if it deems his cooperation "sufficient," Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul Pelletier told Hittner. Davis has met for hundreds of hours with federal investigators, helping them find hundreds of millions of dollars that he claimed Stanford stashed in European banks, Finn said.

"You'll see just how far back this goes," Finn said of the alleged fraud. "This didn't get cooked up overnight."

Stanford, the company founder who is being held without bail, was to appear before Hittner later today for a hearing on his legal defense. Instead, he was taken to a medical center with what a court aide said was an elevated pulse rate.

Getting Together

"I think it had everything to do with my client and Hittner and the government getting together in court today," Finn said of Stanford's health emergency. "You could call it serendipity, but what are the odds?"

Stanford's assets were frozen by the court at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's request and his current lawyer has asked to leave the case, saying he might not get paid. A U.S. grand jury indicted Stanford and Chief Investment Officer Laura Pendergest-Holt for fraud in June.

Davis waived indictment and was charged separately with conspiracy to commit mail, wire and securities fraud, as well as mail fraud and conspiracy to obstruct an SEC investigation.

The SEC in a civil suit accused Stanford, Davis and Pendergest-Holt of running a fraud scheme centered on the sale of certificates of deposit by Antigua-based Stanford International Bank Ltd. Stanford and Davis promised "improbable if not impossible" returns on the CDs, the SEC said.

After today's hearing, Finn told reporters Davis's cooperation included a visit to his family farm in rural Mississippi, where he helped a government dive team search for evidence in tanks and ponds.

Not a Dime

Asked what the nature of that evidence was, Finn replied, "you'll find out." Davis is working as a laborer on a Michigan farm, where he's being paid $10 an hour, and is penniless, his lawyer said.

"He doesn't have a dime," Finn said. "He can't even pay me."

Since his July 13 arraignment, Davis has been free on $500,000 bond, which includes a $5,000 cash deposit. He faces as many as 30 years in prison and won't be sentenced until the government no longer needs his cooperation.

Finn said Davis's cooperation has focused on two fronts: locating assets Stanford stashed overseas and helping the U.S. extradite Antigua's top banking regulator, Leroy King, who was indicted along with Stanford for allegedly taking bribes to conceal the fraud.

"Cash payments were being made under the table in an airplane hanger by Allen Stanford to the regulator," Finn said.

King, who is under house arrest, is scheduled for an extradition hearing in Antigua next month, according to prosecutors.

The case is U.S. v. Davis, 4:09-cr-00335, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Texas (Houston).


Visit the Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG official forum http://sivg.org/forum/

Dienstag, 25. August 2009

Stanford Victims file Class Action Suit against Trustmark National Bank, HSBC Bank PLC, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, SG Private Banking (SUISSE) S.A., and Bank of Houston TX

August 25, 2009
By Peter Morgenstern
Victims of Stanford International Bank, Ltd., part of R. Allen Stanford's Stanford Finanical Group, filed a class action lawsuit in Texas state court in Houston on August 23, alleging that Trustmark National Bank, HSBC Bank PLC, The Toronto-Dominion Bank, SG Private Banking (Suisse) S.A., and Bank of Houston "provided essential assistance to Stanford in one of the largest financial crimes in history."

The class action petition alleges that the banks conspired with Stanford to commit fraud. The plaintiffs seek more than $7 billion in damages. The lawsuit also seeks to recover of all of the fees paid to the banks by Stanford under the Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act.

The plaintiffs are represented by the New York law firm of Morgenstern & Blue, LLC, which last month filed a class action complaint against the Commonwealth of Antigua and Barbuda alleging that the island nation conspired with Stanford and protected Stanford's banking activities from scrutiny by the Securities and Exchange Commission and other regulators.

The case is Rotstain v. Trustmark National Bank, Harris County (Houston).


Visit the Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG official forum http://sivg.org/forum/

Montag, 27. Juli 2009

Texas Department of Banking

Texas-Antigua
July 27, 2001 Texas Banking Commissioner And Antigua & Barbuda International Financial Sector Regulatory Authority Sign Agreement On Information Sharing.

The Texas Banking Commissioner and the Antigua & Barbuda International Financial Sector Regulatory Authority announce the signing of an Agreement on Information Sharing between the two financial institution supervisory authorities. The agreement provides for information sharing and efficient supervision for jointly supervised financial institutions.

The Agreement on Information Sharing is the first between the State of Texas, the Texas Department of Banking, and a foreign government regarding the supervision of financial institutions. The agreement is the culmination of more than a year's effort between the two banking supervisory authorities.

"Our goal is coordinated comprehensive supervision," said Texas Banking Commissioner Randall S. James today. "This document represents a landmark in cooperation between financial institution supervisory authorities of the State of Texas and a foreign government. It underscores that seamless supervision of both Texas State-chartered financial institutions with offices in other countries and foreign institutions with offices in Texas can be achieved."

The Executive Director of the Antigua and Barbuda Authority, Althea Crick, hailed the agreement as "an instrument of benefit to the supervisory authorities of both Texas and Antigua and Barbuda which will be able to share information about any Antigua and Barbuda or Texas banks operating in both jurisdictions in the interest of all parties including depositors."

"As international commerce becomes commonplace, closer cooperation between nations is essential on matters relating to banking and financial institutions," said Secretary of State Henry Cuellar. "The agreement that the Texas Banking Commissioner has signed with fellow financial institution supervisors in Antigua and Barbuda should serve as a model for similar agreements and as a preview of the kind of information sharing that will be increasingly common in the Global Century."



Visit the Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG official forum http://sivg.org/forum/

Freitag, 24. Juli 2009

Stanford's Shredded Florida Papers Being Reassembled

Shredded documents seized from R. Allen Stanford's South Florida offices are being pieced back together by prosecutors probing allegations the Texas financier ran a $7 billion Ponzi scheme.

U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry Seltzer of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, said federal prosecutors told him yesterday that within the next two months they will have "re-assembled the contents of three bags of shredded documents," according to a report posted today on the court's Web site.

The shredded evidence will initially be used against Bruce Perraud, a former Stanford Financial Group security specialist who is charged with destroying documents after an investigation began. Perraud's trial date, set for Aug. 24, will probably change to accommodate his lawyer's vacation plans, Seltzer said.

Stanford, four of his executives and Antigua's former top banking regulator are charged with defrauding investors of as much as $7 billion through bogus certificates of deposit sold by Antigua-based Stanford International Bank. The charges mirror U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission civil claims filed against Stanford and three of his companies on Feb. 17.

Perraud, who isn't accused of participating in the alleged fraud, worked at Stanford's Fort Lauderdale office, according to an indictment unsealed in June. Prosecutors claim Perraud told a document-shredding company to destroy a 95-gallon bin full of papers on Feb. 25, a week after a Texas judge presiding over the SEC case issued an order forbidding the alteration, removal or destruction of Stanford Financial records.

Edward Shohat, Perraud's lawyer, said in a July 22 telephone interview that his client intends to fight the charge.

Prosecutors told Seltzer that, in addition to the reassembled shredded documents, they intend to use six seized computer hard drives as evidence against Perraud.


Visit the Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG official forum http://sivg.org/forum/

Freitag, 17. Juli 2009

Stanford "was informant for US anti-drug agents"

DEA
RAS indicted July 17, 2009

Sir Allen Stanford, the Texan billionaire who ploughed millions of pounds into English cricket, may have been working as an informant for American anti-drug agents in return for official protection which gave him free rein to run his banking empire, it emerged yesterday.

An investigation into the financier has found that just $500m (£331m) of the claimed $7.2bn of deposits held by his Stanford International Bank, based in Antigua, has been traced by a UK-based receiver who was called in by authorities when fraud allegations were laid against Stanford in February.

The resulting $6.7bn hole in the bank's balance sheet, which leaves 28,000 depositors - including 200 Britons - with near-worthless investment certificates, raises serious concerns about the extent to which officials in America and Britain were aware of Stanford's personal finance issues and the activities of his banks long before the current economic crisis.

Sir Allen Stanford, the Texan billionaire who ploughed millions of pounds into English cricket.
A BBC Panorama programme, to be screened tonight, alleges that the 6ft 4in-tall businessman may have been allowed to run his banking business unfettered for up to a decade because he was passing information on to America's Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) about the money-laundering activities of drug baron clients from Colombia, Mexico and Venezuela.

His status as a confidential informant could have secured Stanford a degree of protection from financial regulators such as the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and may explain why a SEC investigation into his dealings in 2006 was quietly dropped following a request by another American government agency.

A source close to the DEA told Panorama: "We were convinced that Stanford's bank attracted millions of narco-dollars but it was very difficult to get the evidence to nail him. The word is that Stanford has been a confidential informer for the DEA since at least 1999."

Confidential documents show the British Foreign Office and the American authorities also knew as early as 1990 that Stanford, who was once listed as the 205th most wealthy man in the United States with a personal fortune of $2.2bn, had been made personally bankrupt in 1984 after his first business, a chain of health clubs, went bust.

British authorities ceased their investigation into Stanford after he moved his operations from the volcanic island of Montserrat, a British overseas territory, to Antigua, which has been independent from the UK since 1981.

Stanford, shot to prominence last year when he signed a multimillion-dollar deal to sponsor a Twenty/20 cricket tournament, culminating in a $20m match between England and an all-stars West Indian team. The billionaire was famously allowed to land his helicopter on the hallowed turf of Lords.

He vigorously denied all allegations of wrongdoing when the SEC froze his assets and accused him of orchestrating a "fraudulent, multibillion-dollar investment scheme" which effectively used the money of new investors to pay large dividends to existing depositors. The Texan has vowed to return money to all depositors and ruled out running a pyramid scheme.

The Foreign Office said it was not responsible for the investment decisions of individuals. But a spokesperson said: "The UK Government does take financial malpractice very seriously."

Source: http://sivg.org/article/Stanford_informant-DEA.html


Visit the Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG official forum http://sivg.org/forum/

Mittwoch, 15. Juli 2009

OPEN LETTER TO US PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA

July 15, 2009
By Stanford Victims Coalition
Dear President Obama,

We are the victims of what has been alleged to be one of the most fraudulent, politically corrupt,and criminal financial operations in history. We are the innocent investors who fell through the cracks of the US financial regulatory structure. We lost our entire life's savings to a largely unregulated financial broker dealer headquartered in the United States of America – Stanford Financial Group.

The Stanford scandal has devastated the lives of thousands of victims from around the world including 35 states in the US and 60 countries. The victims are people who did everything right and our life's savings totaling $7.2 billion is now gone. We are retired school teachers, war veterans, small business owners, and honest, hard-working people who took every possible step to ensure the safety of our retirement funds. We did not simply make bad investments. We relied on the information provided by our financial regulators and our licensed financial advisors – all of which pointed to a healthy and growing American financial institution.

For over two decades, the Stanford Financial Group and its various entities, including Stanford International Bank-Antigua, were able to operate without adequate oversight by numerous government agencies charged with protecting us. Multiple US government agencies had knowledge of Stanford's alleged fraudulent business practices and corruption within the government of Antigua, yet Stanford investors were never warned. The US State Department, the Department of Justice, the US Treasury, the SEC and FINRA all had considerable evidence to warn investors and to take actions to protect investors dating back to at least 1999.

In the aftermath of the SEC's February 2009 raid of Stanford's offices, we have learned that the US sat back and allowed a financial institution to take in billions of dollars in IRAs, ERISA pension plans, college funds and general life's savings despite well-documented internal evidence that should have warranted enforcement actions on multiple fronts, but instead resulted in the endorsement of Stanford by numerous members of Congress and even at the highest echelons of the US government.

The Stanford victims are collateral damage - caught between the "massive ongoing fraud" alleged by the SEC and the lack of government action on a national and international level that would have saved us from devastation.

President Obama, you have taken extraordinary measures to help put America on a path to financial recovery, yet thousands of financial fraud victims are now becoming burdens on their families and the government because the US government has not been accountable for its actions and inactions. Our request of you is, at a minimum, to ensure the US government discloses what really happened with the Stanford Financial Group and how such an intricate scheme was able to infiltrate the global financial system and ruin the lives of so many innocent victims.

The entire world is watching how the American regulatory and legal systems will handle the debilitating losses of innocent victims of alleged financial fraud like the Stanford case. These victims have been denied the SIPC insurance coverage we legally qualify for and now face a long road to what appears to be an extremely limited recovery. The American financial system cannot afford to convey the message that defrauded investors in the US and abroad will be deprived of the right to have their life's savings protected. We are the prime example of the need for regulatory reform – and a plan to compensate victims when the system fails.

We ask the US government to explore all options to help Stanford victims recover their losses and to address the legislative need for compensation for those who suffer catastrophic losses when compliance requirements are not appropriately enforced by government regulators. We are not asking for a bailout – we simply want to get back what is rightfully ours.

http://sivg.org/article/obama_letter.html


Visit the Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG official forum http://sivg.org/forum/

Montag, 13. Juli 2009

Class Action Suit filed against Antigua

July 13, 2009
By Peter Morgenstern
A major international class action lawsuit was filed today by attorney Peter Morgenstern on behalf of all Stanford International Bank-Antigua victims. The suit is against the Commonwealth of Antigua and Barbuda for claims of $24 Billion under the RICO Act, which entitles plaintiffs to seek treble damages of 3 times the actual losses. Some of our SVC members are named as plaintiffs along with victims from 6 or 7 different countries and will represent all victims in the "class." The case was filed in the US District Court in Houston. All victims are part of the suit and there is no need to "sign up."

Here is an excerpt from the suit:

This is an action to recover billions of dollars of losses suffered by innocent and unsuspecting customers from around the world who entrusted their money to R. Allen Stanford's Stanford International Bank, Ltd. ("SIBL"), part of the Stanford Financial Group ("SFG"), which has now been exposed as one of the most notorious, fraudulent, corrupt, and criminal enterprises in history.

Antigua is sovereign, but not above the law. It became a full partner in Stanford's fraud, and reaped enormous financial benefits from the scheme. Stanford stuffed Antigua's coffers – and its officials' pockets – with money stolen from unsuspecting customers throughout the United States, Canada, Central America, South America, and elsewhere. Antigua worked tirelessly to protect and nurture Stanford's criminal enterprise and, in return, eagerly accepted its share of criminally-procured funds.

Stanford's massive fraud would not have been possible without the active, knowing, and essential assistance of Antigua. Antigua: (i) provided a safe haven for Stanford to operate; (ii) provided essential assistance in Stanford's efforts to portray itself to Plaintiffs and other members of the Class as a legitimate provider of financial services; (iii) participated with Stanford in a variety of commercial activities in Antigua that provided a pretext for the transfer of criminal proceeds from Stanford to Antigua; (iv) provided false and fraudulent information to the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and other regulators in order to thwart the SEC's investigations into Stanford; and (v) shared in the criminal proceeds of the conspiracy, all or substantially all of which were stolen from the Plaintiffs and other members of the Class.


Visit the Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG official forum http://sivg.org/forum/

Sonntag, 12. Juli 2009

HSBC acted as Correspondant Bank to Stanford

July 12, 2009
While no Stanford financial company had any presence in the UK, they used the British banking system through HSBC London as their correspondent bank for all deposits in Sterling and Euros.

Most people around the world are aware of HSBC bank. HSBC gave SIB an aura of respectability which simply wasn't appropriate or warranted.

Having looked at the money laundering regulations introduced throughout the European Economic Area (EEA) in 2007 which were passed into British law as Statutory Instrument 2007 number 2157, there are a couple of points to be noted:

1) The regulations state: A credit institution ("the correspondent") which has or proposes to have a correspondent banking relationship with a respondent institution ("the respondent") from a non-EEA state must—(a) gather sufficient information about the respondent to understand fully the nature of its business; (b) determine from publicly-available information the reputation of the respondent and the quality of its supervision. As you may be aware, the British government had revoked the banking license of Alan Stanford's Guardian International Bank situated on Montserrat which would usually undermine one's "reputation" in banking. Further SIB was audited by an unknown auditor.

2) The regulations also state: A credit institution must not enter into, or continue, a correspondent banking relationship with a shell bank….A "shell bank" means a credit institution, or an institution engaged in equivalent activities, incorporated in a jurisdiction in which it has no physical presence involving meaningful decision-making and management, and which is not part of a financial conglomerate or third-country financial conglomerate. You might be aware that the US receiver has issued a statement indicating that the mind and management of SIB was solidly placed in the US and not in Antigua. Further SIB was not part of Stanford Financial Group. It was an affiliate.

While there is little doubt that the subtleties of the Stanford situation have only come to light after the US Securities and Exchange Commission's freeze on all Stanford assets, the Uk governemnt were aware that this "bank" was being monitored and were in fact monitoring SIB them selves. HSBC is an enormous bank with many more resources to hand than individual investors. Further, agreeing to be a correspondent bank for all Euro transactions with a bank outside of the EEA should add an additional responsibility to undertake thorough due diligence given the ability to transfer funds freely within the EU and EEA.

How was it possible for HSBC to have become the correspondent bank for all Sterling and Euro deposits given the exercise of due diligence expected from correspondent banking with offshore entities and the history that Allen Stanford had with the British banking authorities.

The Foreign and Commonwealth Office comments to the recent BBC Panorama programme on Alan Stanford said that the "UK government does take financial malpractice very seriously and issues regular advice on countries and jurisdictions where there may be serious deficiencies in regulation. It is for companies and the financial professionals they employ to act on this advice with all due diligence". Presumably, the last part of this comment would apply to HSBC.

There have been many blunders it seems in the case of discovering what was at the heart of Allen Stanford's financial empire. We, as UK depositors with the bank, can only hope that all of those involved will participate in helping us recover our investments. One part of this is for HSBC (and the various insurance policies it holds) to step up to its part in the scheme and to assist those who deposited funds through them.


Visit the Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG official forum http://sivg.org/forum/

Sonntag, 5. Juli 2009

R. Allen Stanford and Miami-based Greenberg Traurig

John Ellis Bush July 5, 2009

Miami Herald runs an excellent story on R. Allen Stanford (charged with multi-billion fraud) and a new angle: the stage was set for Stanford's multi-billion fraud in 1998, the year Stanford persuaded Florida banking regulators to grant his company special rights to open a Miami office outside the scrutiny of federal banking regulators. In this unique instance, Sanford was represented by Greenberg Traurig.

"There was no lawful way that office should have been opened", said Richard Donelan, the state's chief banking counsel who opposed the deal.

1998, the year Jeb Bush was elected governor of Florida. That year and that election set the stage for the the biggest boom in housing and construction in Florida history, now in ruins. Jeb won in South Florida, and primarily through the coordination of his base constituency (builders and developers) and as a result, Miami is the epicenter of the housing bust.

This is the place the gears of the machine all lined up to mesh Wall Street financial motive with political levers at the most intricate level of decision making, from state authority to local zoning allowing unsustainable growth.
John Ellis "Jeb" Bush (* 11. Februar 1953 in Midland, Texas) ist ein US-amerikanischer Politiker (Republikaner) und war von 1999 bis 2007 der 43. Gouverneur von Florida.
The boom, based on unsustainable foundations and fraud, destroyed South Florida's quality of life and environment, minting millionaires through the reciprocal arrangements of campaign contributions and politicians. And Greenberg Traurig attorneys seem to pop up everywhere.

Stanford obtained authority to do offshore banking (an exclusive arrangement) with the help of Greenberg Traurig lobbyists from a Democratic administration in Tallahassee during the 1998 campaign for governor. Stanford does not begin to show up, according to a brief and cursory review of campaign contribution lists, as a prolific political donor until 2000. His contributions appear to be weighted to Democrats. Whose chains did Greenberg Traurig help to pull, during 1998, for Stanford in Tallahassee?

"Earlier, (Stanford) went to Miami attorney Bowman Brown, who said he declined to represent Stanford. A longtime banking lawyer, Brown said there were several elements that didn't seem right about Stanford's plan. "He wanted to set up an office in Miami to serve a business operation in the Caribbean," said Brown. "The idea was to attract a Latin American clientele as a platform to sell securities."

But Brown said Stanford "was not interested in undergoing any substantive banking regulations or submitting to government examiners." Brown said. By the time the state approved the trust office in December 1998, Stanford was already hawking his top product: certificates of deposit."

Could McKay Democrats, who were fish out of water when it came to understanding the Hispanic politics of South Florida, have been persuaded by Greenberg Traurig to help Stanford, based on their near perfect understanding of local politics? It is a key point avoided in the Herald story and a question the Herald should pursue.



Visit the Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG official forum http://sivg.org/forum/

Florida banking agency helped Stanford set up unregulated office to sell his CDs



RAS indicted July 5, 2009

Florida regulators - over objections by the state's top banking lawyer - gave sweeping powers to banker Allen Stanford, accused of swindling investors of $7 billion.

Years before his banking empire was shut down in a massive fraud case, Allen Stanford swept into Florida with a bold plan: entice Latin Americans to pour millions into his ventures - in secrecy.

From a bayfront office in Miami in 1998, he planned to sell investments to customers and send their money to Antigua.

But to pull it off, he needed unprecedented help from an unlikely ally: The state of Florida would have to grant him the right to move vast amounts of money offshore - without reporting a penny to regulators; And he got it.

Over objections by the state's chief banking lawyer - including concerns that Stanford was laundering money - regulators granted sweeping powers never given to a private company.
Indicted financier R. Allen Stanford, accused of leading a $7 billion investment fraud scheme.
The new company was also allowed to sell hundreds of millions in bank notes without allowing regulators to check for fraud.

Over the next decade, the Miami office was among Stanford's busiest in the sale of controversial investments now at the heart of the federal government's sweeping fraud case against Stanford and his lieutenants.

"There was no lawful way that office should have been opened," said Richard Donelan, the state's chief banking counsel who opposed the deal.

Donelan said he argued that the Stanford plan violated state law, and that there were concerns about money laundering in the Caribbean and "whether Stanford's bank was in conformance with the law."
Art Simon TAKING ADVANTAGE

Represented by a powerful Florida law firm, Stanford got approval to create the first company of its kind: a foreign trust office that could bypass regulators, according to records obtained by The Miami Herald.

The Florida banking director who signed the agreement, Art Simon, now admits he made a mistake.

"Upon reflection, would I have liked to have done it differently? Would I have liked to stop them from doing what they currently did? Yes, of course."

The state's decision allowed Stanford to expand his banking network by offering his prize investments - certificates of deposit - without reporting the purchases, according to state and court records.

In the first six years, the office - known as Stanford Fiduciary Investor Services - took in $600 million from customers, state records show. At least 2,100 customer accounts were set up at the Miami office in the first six years, state records show.
Art Simon, the Florida banking director who signed the agreement.
Unlike other Stanford companies around the country, the Miami office was exempt from reporting the amounts of money sent overseas - bypassing anti-laundering laws. In fact, employees shredded records of the trust agreements and CD purchases once the original documents were sent to Antigua, state records show.

FEW PROTECTIONS

Officials for the Florida Office of Financial Regulation are now reviewing the decision made a decade ago, but they refuse to comment.

"All I can tell you is that there was no one that specifically regulated the office," said Linda Charity, director of the state's Division of Financial Institutions.

Simon, the Florida banking director who approved the agreement, says he should have banned the office from handling money.

"It raised serious questions in my mind after the fact as to whether we should have had tighter provisions," said Simon, a former state representative who helped draft much of Florida's modern banking legislation.

The office was only supposed to provide information for people interested in the offshore trust's services - not offer CDs and accept money, he said.

But in clear language, the agreement reached between Stanford and state regulators allows money to flow to and from the center.

Several lawyers who reviewed the documents for The Herald said much of the responsibility rests with Simon. "In this case, he was responsible for having an effective system of enforcement," said Jeffrey Sonn, a Fort Lauderdale securities attorney. "The state didn't do the kind of reviews it needed to do."



Visit the Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG official forum http://sivg.org/forum/

Donnerstag, 18. Juni 2009

Indictment vs. Robert Allen Stanford

June 18, 2009
U.S. Department of Justice
Conspiracy to Commit Mail, Wire and Securities Fraud (Violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371)
Stanford Financial Group (SFG) was the parent company of Stanford Internatioon Bank, Ltd. and a web of other affiliated financial services entities, including Stanford Group Company. SFG maintained offices in several locations, including Houston, Texas, Memphis, Tennessee, and Miami, Florida.

Stanford International Bank, Ltd. (SIBL) was a private, offshore bank with offices on the island of Antigua and elsewhere. SIBL was organized in or about 1985 in Montserrat, originally under the name of Guardian International Bank. In or about 1989, SIBL's principal banking location was moved to Antigua.

Pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461 (c), and Title 18, United States Code, Section 981 (a)(1)(c), the United States gives notice to the defendants, Robert Allen Stanford, Laura Pendergest-Holt, Gilberto Lopez, Mark Kuhrt and Leroy King, that in the event of their conviction of any of the offenses charged in Counts One through Eighteen of this Indictment, the United States intends to forfeit the following property:

  • All property, real or personal, which constitutes or is derived from proceeds traceable to each such offense, including the conspiracy to commit such offenses, including but not limited to all monies on deposit in the following bank accounts:
HSBC Bank, PLC, London, United Kingdom
Beneficiary: Stanford International Bank Ltd.
Account Number:
xxxx0160
xxxx3136
xxxx8105
xxxx0538

Credit Suisse, United Kingdom
Beneficiary: Stanford International Bank Ltd.
Account Number:
LDxxx051
LDxxx465
LDxxx830
2LFxxx651
LDxxx909

SG Private Banking, Geneva, Switzerland
Beneficiary: Stanford International Bank (Antigua)
Account Number:
xxx 800
xxx 801
Beneficiary: Stanford Financial Group LTD, Lausanne
Account Number:
xxx 731
Beneficiary: Robert Allen Stanford
Account Number:
x xxx 600

SG Private Banking, Lausanne, Switzerland
Beneficiary: Stanford International Bank Ltd.
Account Number:
xxx 782

Banque Franck Galland & Cie S.A., Geneva, Switzerland
Beneficiary: Stanford International Bank Ltd.
Account Number:
xxx-xxxx-934

Banque Franck, Galland, Geneva, Switzerland
Beneficiary: Stanford International Bank (Antigua)
Account Number:
xxx 058

Bank Julius Baer and Co. Ltd., Zurich
Beneficiary: Stanford International Bank Ltd.
Account Number:
xxxxxx9574

Julius Baer, Zurich, Switzerland
Beneficiary: Stanford International Bank (Antigua)
Account Number:
xx.xxx.6744

RBS Coutts, Zurich, Switzerland
Beneficiary: Stanford International Bank (Antigua)
Account Number:
xx xxx 375

Coutts Bank Von Ernst, Geneva, Switzerland
Beneficiary: Stanford International Bank Ltd.
Account Number:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx5110AF

Toronto Dominion Bank, Canada
Beneficiary: Stanford International Bank Ltd.
Account Number:
xxxxxx-xxx1573
xxxxxx-xxx1670
xxxxxx-xxx4235
xxxxxx-xxx0513
xxxxxx-xxx0380
xxxxxx-xxx5558
xxxxxx-xxx5569
xxxxxx-xxx5624
 
Updated Indictment vs. Robert Allen Stanford
Document Filed in TXSD on 05/04/11
Please be aware that following account numbers do not appear in this new Indictment. That deserves a clear explanation about those missing accounts (4 accounts from Switzerland are missing).

SG Private Banking, Lausanne, Switzerland
Beneficiary: Stanford International Bank Ltd.
Account Number:
xxx 782

Banque Franck Galland & Cie S.A., Geneva, Switzerland
Beneficiary: Stanford International Bank Ltd.
Account Number:
xxx-xxxx-934

Bank Julius Baer and Co. Ltd., Zurich
Beneficiary: Stanford International Bank Ltd.
Account Number:
xxxxxx9574

Coutts Bank Von Ernst, Geneva, Switzerland
Beneficiary: Stanford International Bank Ltd.
Account Number:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx5110AF

Following the new accounts added to the Updated Indictment vs. Robert Allen Stanford:

SG Private Banking, Geneva, Switzerland
Account Holder: Bank of Antigua Ltd.
Account Number:
XXX732

RBS Coutts, Zurich, Switzerland
Beneficiary: Stanford International Bank (Antigua)
Account Number:
XX XXX560
XX XXX565

Union Bancaire Privee UBP, Geneva
Account Holder: Bank of Antigua Ltd.
Account Number:
XXXX203

Friends Provident International Limited
Account Holder: The Prophecy Trust
Account Number:
XX8097

Coutts Bank Ltd.
Account Holder: Southpac Life Insurance Limited
Account Number:
XXXX7443.1000

Credit Suisse, Zurich
Account Holder: Stanford Group (Suisse) SA
Account Number:
XXXX-XXX X50-4

First Bank Virgin Islands
Account Holder: C.A.S. Hewlett
Account Number:
XXXXXXX131

First Citizens Bank dba Sun American Bank, Boca Raton, Florida
Account Holder: Rebecca Reeves-Stanford
Account Number:
XXXXXX306

Marex Financial Limited
Account Holder: Bank of Antigua
Account Number:
XX885
Account Holder: Stanford International Bank, Limited
Account Number:
XX886
Account Holder: Stanford Financial Group, Limited
Account Number:
XX889


Visit the Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG official forum http://sivg.org/forum/

Dienstag, 16. Juni 2009

The NASD, the SEC and the DOJ did not disclose critical information

June 16, 2009
The NASD was a self-regulatory organization of the securities industry responsible for the operation and regulation of the Nasdaq stock market and over-the-counter markets.

The NASD watches over the Nasdaq to make sure the market operates correctly. In 2007, the NASD merged with the New York Stock Exchange's regulation committee to form the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA.

The NASD, the SEC and the DOJ received numerous reports of the fraud being carried on by Stanford Group over the past decade and the least they could have done was disclose that information so investors could make an informed decision.

News separator
September 1, 2003
NASD Complaint Center
1735 K Street NW
Washington, D.C. 20000-1500
RE: Stanford Financial Group
Case of Corporate Fraud
Since business scandals like those of ENRON and WORLDCOM became public, it is the duty of all Americans to speak up and denounce any wrongdoing of Corporate America for the sake of justice to many impoverished innocent people. This letter discloses another possible case of "Corporate Fraud" being perpetuated by the Stanford Financial Group and its owner, banking and real estate mogul Mr. Allen Stanford.

Stanford Financial is the subject of a lingering Corporate Fraud Scandal perpetuated as a "Massive Ponzi Scheme" that will destroy the life savings of many, damage the reputation of all associated parties, ridicule Securities and Banking authorities, and shame the United States of America.

The Stanford Financial Group of Houston, Texas has been selling to people of the United States and of Latin America, offshore certificates of deposit issued by Stanford International Bank, a wholly owned unregulated subsidiary. With the mask of a regulated US Corporation and by association with Wall Street giant Bear Stearns, investors are led to believe these CD's are absolutely safe investments. Notwithstanding this promise, investor proceeds are being directed into speculative investments like stocks, options, futures, currencies, real estate, and unsecured loans.

For the past seventeen years or so, Stanford International Bank has reported to clients in perfect format and beautifully printed material of the highest quality, consistent high returns on the bank's portfolio, with never a down year, regardless of the volatile nature of the investments. By showing these unbelievable returns, Stanford has justified the expense spent on luxury, lavish styles of management, high bonuses, and generous contributions to all sorts of causes.

The questionable activities of the bank have been covered up by an apparent clean operation of a US Broker-Dealer affiliate with offices in Houston, Miami, and other cities that clears through Bear Stearns Securities Corporation. Registered representatives of the firm, as well as many unregistered representatives that office within the B-D, are unreasonably pressured into selling the CD's. Solicitation of these high risk offshore securities occurs from the United States and investors are misled about the true nature of the securities.

The offshore bank has never been audited by a large reputable accounting firm, and Stanford has never shown verifiable portfolio appraisals. The banks portfolio is invested primarily in high risk securities, which is not congruent with the nature of safe CD investments promised to clients.

For reference purposes, attached are copies of financial statements of the bank for the years 2000 and 2001 taken from the annual reports. These reports indicate some very untimely investments decisions, extremely high risk profiles, elevated expenses, and no disclosure about the investment portfolio.

Stanford has been in the past the subject of numerous investigations and press articles that have focused on the dubious activities and deals of Mr. Allen Stanford, who recently became a citizen of Antigua. These investigations have focused on issues like, bribery of the Government of Antigua, illegal selling of offshore securities and money laundering, but have missed the point of truly unveiling the value of the bank's portfolio, which has been covered up by the bank's non-jurisdictional nature. Unbelievable returns of the portfolio, non verifiable portfolio appraisals, non prudent investment strategies, information from insiders, and lavish expense management styles, suggest the portfolio is deeply underwater. If true, returns and expenses are being paid out of clients' monies and by the size of the portfolio, this would be one of the largest Ponzi Schemes ever discovered.

This letter is being written by an insider who does not wish to remain silent, but also fears for his own personal safety and that of his family. The issue is being referred for investigations to the proper authorities, related parties, and persons whose mission is to inform the general public. The key point to focus on is the real market value of Stanford International Bank's investment portfolio, which is believed to be significantly below the bank's obligations to clients. Overlooking these issues and not thoroughly investigating them is becoming an accomplice to any wrongdoing.

Sincerely yours,
INSIDER
Cc: Bear Stearns Securities Corporation
The Securities and Exchange Commission
The US Senate Committee
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
The National Association of Securities Dealers
The Wall Street Journal
The Miami Herald
The Washington Post

News separator
U.S. Department of Justice
Criminal Division
September 9, 2004
Mr. Conrad A. Airall
Attorney at Law
7 North Bloodworth Street
Raleigh, NC 27601

Dear Mr. Airall:
This is in response to correspondence dated February 10, 2004, sent to the Department of Justice on your behalf from Congressman Bob Etheridge regarding your concerns over possible violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act by a U.S. businessman doing business in Antigua and Barbados. Congressman Etheridge has asked the Department of Justice to respond directly to you. We apologize for not responding sooner to your inquiry.

We appreciate you having brought these allegations to our attention and will take appropriate investigative steps in connection with this matter.

Thanks you for your inquiry. Please do not hesitate to contact us if the Department of Justice can be of assistance in the future.

Sincerely,
Christopher A. Wray
Assistant Attorney General


Visit the Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG official forum http://sivg.org/forum/

Freitag, 5. Juni 2009

DOJ Halted SEC's Investigation Into Stanford Financial

DOJ Stanford June 5, 2009

The Securities and Exchange Commission [SEC] was told to stand down in its investigation of billionaire financier Robert Allen Stanford's global banking empire by the Department of Justice, according to the chairman of the Domestic Policy Subcommittee of the Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

The SEC received numerous reports of the fraud being carried on by Stanford Group over the past decade and the least they could have done was disclose that information so investors could make an informed decision.
US Department of Justice.
Instead, the SEC became an accomplice to the fraud that has resulted in the loss of 28,000 investors' retirement accounts, family trusts, pension plans and college savings.

"For over a decade, the US government, including the DOJ (Department of Justice), the Treasury and the SEC had solid evidence of Robert Allen Stanford's alleged criminal activities and investors were never warned. Whether Robert Allen Stanford is guilty or not, the reality is that our entire life's savings is lost and these victims relied on information from the US government agencies when making the decision to invest with Stanford Group. These agencies did not disclose critical information that would have prevented us from losing our life's savings."

"The entire world is watching how the American judicial and financial regulatory system will handle the debilitating losses of victims of massive fraud like the Stanford case. These victims have been denied help by the US government and are now facing a long road to an extremely limited recovery".



Visit the Stanford International Victims Group - SIVG official forum http://sivg.org/forum/